I came accross an article titled IBM's KM Strategy, at KMWorld. It discuss the very first beginnings of Knowledge Management inside IBM. How it has actually been really strong with the explicit knowledge exchange, i.e. asset management, through the existence of different Intellectual Capital repositories, beingKnowledgeView (From Global Business Services) one of the most powerful and popular ones, and other key areas of how KM has been envisioned all along. Such as:
One thing I would like to not - I noticed that IBM's KM tools have all been very much focused primarily on transferring explicit knowledge as opposed to a more balanced approach between the sharing of explicit and tacit knowledge. Why is that?
No comments:
Post a Comment